Printer-friendly page
Average: 3.8 (269 votes)

WWI: Medicine on the battlefield

by John Campbell
Text reprinted with permission from Tar Heel Junior Historian, Spring 1993
Tar Heel Junior Historian Association, NC Museum of History

From a medical standpoint, World War I was a miserable and bloody affair. In less than a year the American armed forces suffered more than 318,000 casualties, of which 120,000 were deaths. Almost 6,000 of these casualties were North Carolinians.

When the United States entered the war in 1917, the army did not have an established medical corps. During the war, the army medical corps copied parts of the French and English medical system that had been in use for the past three years. This system arranged military medical staff in a practical manner. Stretcher-bearers first came into contact with the wounded and moved them from trenches to waiting ambulances. The first aid treatment these medics gave often saved lives. Lieutenant Andrew Green wrote to friends in Raleigh praising the stretcher-bearers who carried him over one mile through enemy shell fire after he was wounded in the leg. Private Clarence C. Moore related that he “was a stretcher bearer in the Hindenburg Line for about half a day. We had to step on these dead soldiers to keep from going in the water and mud so deep and throwing the [wounded] off the stretcher. . . . “

"Diagnosis tag book." 1917-18. Made by William J. Brewer. NC Museum of History. Accession No. H.1961.63.124.

Motorized transport proved to be the fastest and most efficient way to move the wounded. Ambulances rushed them to mobile dressing stations or field hospitals that followed the advancing and retreating troops. From there the severely injured were taken to base hospitals far behind the lines. North Carolinians organized and staffed the 317th Ambulance Company and Base Hospital 65.

Felix Brockman of Greensboro volunteered for the 321st Ambulance Company, which was made up of men from the Greensboro and Winston-Salem areas. He recorded that wounded men were brought from the battlefield to a triage area to be sorted out. Generally there were four kinds of cases: gas injuries, shell shock, diseases, and wounds.

World War I was the first conflict to see the use of deadly gases as a weapon. Gas burned skin and irritated noses, throats, and lungs. It could cause death or paralysis within minutes, killing by asphyxiation. As soon as troops learned that gas was in their area, they had to put on masks. Even having the fumes in their clothing could cause blisters, sores, and other health problems. Bathing and changing clothes immediately helped but was not always possible. Many thousands of gas victims suffered the painful effects of damaged lungs throughout their lives. The use of these gases was banned after the end of World War I.

Some injuries were not physical. Most soldiers got used to living in muddy areas filled with rats, rotting corpses, and exploding shells, but others could not. As the war progressed, a mental illness caused by these conditions became known as shell shock. Sufferers could be hysterical, disoriented, paralyzed, and unable to obey orders.

Soldiers lived and fought in trenches that were little more than swamplike holes in the ground—a perfect breeding ground for disease. Doctors and nurses could do little to help soldiers with influenza and intestinal flu, and these diseases killed more men than machine gun bullets.

Unmerciful pests such as lice also lived in the trenches. One North Carolinian remarked, “At first we had only one kind [of lice]; but now we have the gray-back, the red, the black, and almost every color imaginable.” Lice lived on the soldiers' unclean clothes and bodies. The only way to get rid of the itchy pests was to bathe and change clothes, but often weeks passed before they could do this. Many soldiers also suffered from what doctors called trench foot. After they stood in water for weeks at a time, their socks would begin to grow to their feet. In severe cases, the soldiers’ feet had to be amputated.

Women as well as men cared for the injured and ill. Thousands of women volunteered as nurses, and many worked at least a fourteen-hour day in the hospitals. They often had to come back on duty when hospital trains arrived with more wounded soldiers. Nurses also served in evacuation hospitals only eight or ten miles behind the front lines and well within the range of German artillery. Wounded soldiers remarked that having female nurses as part of the medical staff was very important. Their skillful care saved many lives, and they reminded the injured of their mothers, wives, girlfriends, and sisters back home.

Military medicine had not changed much in the fifty years since the American Civil War. Battlefield doctors were slow to understand the link between exposure and the infections that set in quickly in dirty battlefield hospitals. As doctors became more aware of this link, they had to make sure that the wounded were brought to the operating table within twelve hours or the risk of infection greatly increased. There was only salt water to rinse wounds, and there was no medication to stop infection once it had started. Thousands of men lost arms, legs, and even their lives.

But advances in some medical techniques kept pace with the mass destruction of war. Doctors developed and practiced new ways to treat severe cases of tissue damage, burns, and contagious diseases. Blood transfusions were given under battlefield conditions. Doctors began using X-ray equipment to locate bullets and shrapnel during operations. The quality of American base hospitals increased as their medical staffs grew used to the rigors of the western front.  

Even though medical staffs improved over time, the average soldier did not trust doctors. Marion Andrews of Winston-Salem got a piece of shrapnel in his leg when a wagon he was sleeping in was hit by a German shell. He refused to report to a field hospital, hoping that the wound was minor. After a week he found he had developed blood poisoning, and only then did he surrender to the treatment of doctors.

When it became absolutely necessary, the United States developed a medical corps. At first its training and equipment was wholly lacking and it was ill-prepared to deal with war. But as Americans began to enter combat, the corps produced a workable medical system and actually made advances in the field of medicine.

At the time of this article’s publication, John Campbell served as field registrar in the Collections Management Branch of the North Carolina Museum of History.

Additional resources:

North Carolinians and the Great War. Documenting the American South, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Libraries.

"Wildcats never quit: North Carolina in WWI." State Archives of North Carolina. N.C. Department of Cultural Resources. (accessed September 25, 2013).

"World War I." North Carolina Digital History. Learn NC.

WWI: NC Digital Collections. NC Department of Cultural Resources.

"WWI: The Old North State and 'Kaiser Bill.'" State Archives of North Carolina.N.C. Department of Cultural Resources. 2005. (accessed September 25, 2013).

BBC. How did World War I change the way we treat injuries today? (accessed January 20, 2017).

Birtish Library. Wounding in World War I. (accessed January 20, 2017). Medicine in the War Zone. (accessed January 20, 2017).

Battlefield medicine: search results from WorldCat. (accessed January 20, 2017).

Manring, M. M. et al. "Treatment of War Wounds: A Historical Review." Clin Ortho Relat Res. 2009 Aug 467(8). (accesed January 9, 2017).

Image credit:

"Diagnosis tag book." 1917-18. Made by William J. Brewer. NC Museum of History. Accession No. H.1961.63.124. Online at



What are some of the common questions people ask about female doctors in World War I?

Thank you for your question. Unfortunately, we don't have statistics on this. You may want to go through the comments submitted for this article.

Mike Millner, NC Government & Heritage Library

Hello, first of i would like to say this is a very good article!
I am doing my year 11 research project on how nursing in the army has changed since WWI and WWII to present day... i was wondering if you could tell me..

What kind of medicine was used in WWI and WWII?
Is it only females that were nurses in WWI & WWII?
How has medicine evolved since WWI & WWII to present day?
How have procedures from WWI and WWII changed to present day?
What kinds of procedures were used in WWI and WWII?

Thanks in Advance :)

Dear Taylah,

Thank you for visiting NCpedia and taking time to share your project and questions. 

That sounds like a great project!  Unfortunately, NCpedia has only basic information about medicine on the battlefield in World War I.  When we get this question, I do have a number of suggestions that might help.

First, you may want to visit your school’s library or your local public library and get help from a librarian there who can also help you find resources. Your library may also be able to borrow books from other libraries through interlibrary loan.  

Second, here are a list of resources that I have given students who are looking for more information:

•    BBC website on how WWI changed medical treatment:
•    British Library site on the wounded in WWI:
•    Science Museum, Medicine in the War Zone (WWI):
•    Here are a list of books that pertain to battlefield medicine, primarily in World War I.  If you click on individual books, you can search to see if a library near you might have the book, or your local library may be able to borrow it for you:
•    List of books about battlefield medicine in World War II:
•    List of books about nurses in World War I and World War II:

I hope this helps!  And good luck with your project!

Kelly Agan

My grandfather served during WW1 at the US Evacuation Hospital #26 in France. I've had no luck finding any information about it... even where it was located. Can you point me to something?

Good morning,

Thank you for visiting NCpedia and sharing your grandfather's service and your question.

NCpedia doesn't have any information that would help with this question. Here are a few suggestions:

The U.S. Army Office of Medical History may be able to help.  Here is their website:  Historians and archivists there can help.

On the same website, here is a link to page that mentions hospital number 26, and I see that there are footnotes as well, which may help you find more information.

I'm also including here link to research results from a web search. I see a number of items relating to hospital no. 26:

I hope this helps!

Kelly Agan, Government & Heritage Library

Hi! First of all, great article. One question, do you have any information on the specific medicine they used on and off the battlefield?

Hi Sam,

Thanks for visiting NCpedia and sharing your question.

You may find something useful in the resources included with the article.  In addition, check out these resources:

I hope this helps!

Best wishes,

Kelly Agan, Government & Heritage Library

cool website lots of cool facts

Hey, I want to know more details about the doctors than how they did they're job, so are there any other articles??

Add a comment

PLEASE NOTE: NCpedia provides the comments feature as a way for viewers to engage with the resources. Comments are not published until reviewed by NCpedia editors at the State Library of NC, and the editors reserve the right to not publish any comment submitted that is considered inappropriate for this resource. NCpedia will not publish personal contact information in comments, questions, or responses. If you would like a reply by email, note that some email servers, such as public school accounts, are blocked from accepting messages from outside email servers or domains. If you prefer not to leave an email address, check back at your NCpedia comment for a reply. Please allow one business day for replies from NCpedia. Complete guidelines are available at