Bragg Committee [1]
Bragg Committee
In 1868-69 North Carolina's Reconstruction [3]government extended $27.83 million in the form of bonds and stocks to 18 railroad [4] companies in the state. Although it was mainly zeal for internal improvements [5] that accounted for the state's generosity, some of the more extravagant and ill-advised aid measures resulted from the activities of a railroad "ring" operating primarily through the Republican-controlled General Assembly [6]. The ringleaders were lobbyist Milton S. Littlefield, a suave transplanted northerner, and George W. Swepson, an erstwhile North Carolina banker [7]. Swepson had gained the confidence of Republican governor William W. Holden [8], who foolishly believed that tax revenues would be adequate to meet the interest on the bonds.
By 1870 the bond market had virtually collapsed, leaving North Carolina with a heavy debt and few new railroad miles to show for it. With the state's credit standing deteriorating, both reform Republicans and Conservatives [9] (Democrats) in the General Assembly demanded an investigation of the railroad scandal. The Senate appointed [10]a three-member investigating committee headed by former governor Thomas Bragg [11], a respected Conservative. Influenced by Holden, who believed that the fraud charges were politically motivated, Republicans [12] in the Senate limited the scope of the committee's work and thus prevented a thorough inquiry into the scandal. The Bragg Committee did reveal the need for an extended, unrestricted investigation of the charges. When the Conservatives assumed power later in 1870, they appointed a committee known as the Shipp Commission [13], which subsequently uncovered numerous incidents of fraud and bribery-some involving Conservatives-in the issuance of railroad bonds and stocks. Neither Swepson nor Littlefield, the chief perpetrators of the corruption, were brought to justice.
References:
William C. Harris, William Woods Holden: Firebrand of North Carolina Politics (1987).
Charles L. Price, "Railroads and Reconstruction in North Carolina, 1865-1871" (Ph.D. diss., UNC-Chapel Hill, 1959).
Additional Resources:
"The Case Of Milton S. Littlefield." The New York Times. July 29, 1879. http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F20616FA345B137B93CBAB178CD85F4D8784F9 [14] (accessed October 15, 2012).
"An Act Creating a Commission To Inquire into Charges of Corruption and Fraud." Public laws of the State of North-Carolina, passed by the General Assembly at its Sessoion 1870-1871. Raleigh: James H. Moore. 1871. p.119. http://digital.ncdcr.gov/u?/p249901coll22,180027 [15] (accessed October 15, 2012).
Report of the Commission to Investigate Charges of Fraud and Corruption, under Act of
Assembly, Session 1871-72. Raleigh: J. H. Moore. 1872. http://archive.org/details/reportofcommissi00nort [13] (accessed October 15, 2012).
"The Bragg Committee Investigation-Profligacy and Corruption." The Greensboro Patriot. May 5, 1870. http://libcdm1.uncg.edu/cdm/ref/collection/GSOPatriot/id/9536 [16] (accessed October 15, 2012).
Daniels, Jonathan. Prince of Carpetbaggers. Philadelphia: J.P. Lippincott. 1958.
Image Credits:
"Thomas Bragg." Photograph no. 53.15.1559. From the Audio Visual and Iconographics Collection, Division of Archives and History Photograph Collection, State Archives of North Carolina [17], Raleigh, NC, USA.
1 January 2006 | Harris, William C.



